NPR’s Eric Deggans has some concern about CNN’s more centrist direction it is veering towards, saying, “I hope that what we’re not going to see CNN do is institute some sort of false equivalence.”
Final “Reliable Sources” Sunday, the NPR TV critic thinks the problem with the perception of the media right now is the lens through which they look at today’s politics and the lack of accountability for politicians who break the law or use damaging rhetoric.
“I think the problem is that people put a political lens on top of something that is about preserving democracy and about holding politicians accountable,”Deggans began with Brian Stelter’s interview. “When you have one politician who’s denouncing the press is the enemy of the people. When you have one politician who insists that he won an election that he did not win. When you have one politician who’s blaming immigrants unfairly for America’s ills you have to have a journalism apparatus that is free to call out those accesses, without fear of being accused of being unfair. And I think that’s the problem.”
The exit of CNN’s chief media correspondent, Brian Stelter, and the cancelation of the 30-year-old “Reliable Sources,”Many left concerned about the outcome of the conference, which he hosted.
expressed desire by the network’s new CEO and chairman, Chris Licht, to move away from opinion-based news programming and establish a more “neutral” voice.
“I hope that what we’re not going to see CNN do is institute some sort of false equivalence, where the extremism of one party is balanced with the regular dysfunction of another party,”Deggans claimed. “We need to be free to call out when someone breaks the law, when someone breaks norms, when someone introduces prejudice and stereotypes into the public debate. We need to feel free to call those things out without being accused of being unfair politically when what we’re really doing is trying to see things very clearly and root out the most negative anti-democratic impulses that have risen to the fore in a lot of our public debate.”
All this is great and has a great purpose, but does it satisfy the public? It’s a business. It’s all about bringing in eyes (and therefore advertising dollars). Deggans isn’t certain that facts alone without context or insight tells the complete true story.
“I’m concerned also that it will be hard to hold on to viewers if all you do is just give them facts. They do need context. They do need free and fearless exploration. Even when you have to look hard at a political party or look hard at a political candidate and say this person is breaking the law or breaking norms,”He said.
“Will CNN have the courage to do that? I hope so.”
